Comparison of Competition Patterns and Political Participation in the Islamic Republic of Iran and Discourse Analysis of Political Participation from 1376 to 1396

Document Type : Science - Research

Authors

1 PhD student in Political Science, Department of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IRAN.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, IRAN.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IRAN.

Abstract

This article is an effort based on critical discourse analysis and is carried out by the descriptive-analytical method. The results show that The Reformists and Principlist do not have the same attitude to the political participation. Based on the Guardianship of the Islam Jurist in the field of political principles, the Principlist believe in appointment and consider the legitimacy from top to bottom. They consider the voting of people is a confirmation to them. They also believe that approbatory supervision is necessary and try to develop Islamism rather than republic. On the other hand, the Reformist consider the political participation form bottom to top and they believe that it results in political development. They believe that the government should be formed based on people’s opinion and compared to Principlist, they believe less to approbatory supervision. They emphasize on the importance of republic. In order to determine their own destiny, they try to take the advantage of political participations including voting in elections, establishing societies and organizations, media activities, guild activities, etc. Anyway, the researches show that different patterns can be considered in the field of competition and political participation in Iran.in iran in iran in iran in iran in iran

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [Persian]

مقایسه الگوهای رقابت و مشارکت سیاسی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران و تحلیل گفتمانی مشارکت سیاسی از سال 1376 تا 1396

Authors [Persian]

  • مهدی شهرابی 1
  • علی اشرف نظری 2
  • سید مصطفی ابطحی 3
1 دانشجوی دکترای علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشیار علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.
Abstract [Persian]

این تحقیق با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی برمبنای نظریه تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی انجام شده و نشان می دهد که گفتمان های اصولگرا و اصلاح طلب در مورد مشارکت سیاسی دیدگاه یکسانی ندارند؛ گفتمان اصولگرا با دال اصلی ولایت فقیه، در زمینه مشارکت سیاسی قائل به نصب است و مشروعیت را از بالا به پایین می داند. رأی مردم را تایید خود می شناسد و به ضرورت نظارت استصوابی اعتقاد دارد و بر تقویت اسلام گرایی در مقایسه با جمهوریت تأکید می کند. دال اصلی گفتمان اصلاح طلب توسعه سیاسی حول نشانه اصلی مشارکت سیاسی است و در زمینه مشارکت سیاسی مشروعیت دولت را از پایین به بالا در نظر می گیرد و معتقد است دولت بر اساس رأی و نظر مردم باید شکل بگیرد و کمتر از اصولگرایان به نظارت استصوابی اعتقاد دارد. بر اهمیت جمهوریت تأکید می کند و برای تعیین سرنوشت خود، از طیف گسترده ای از مشارکت سیاسی، از رأی دادن در انتخابات تا تاسیس انجمن‌ها و سازمان ها، فعالیت در مطبوعات و فعالیت های صنفی معتقد است. با این حال یافته ها حاکی از آن است که الگوهای متفاوتی را می توان در زمینه رقابت و مشارکت سیاسی در ایران در نظر گرفت.

Keywords [Persian]

  • رقابت سیاسی
  • مشارکت سیاسی
  • انتخابات
  • مردم

References

Abtahi, M; Heydari, N. (2013 AD/1392 SH). "Partisanship in the Political System of Velayat-e Faqih." Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 9, no. 24, pp. 127-152.
 
Akbari, E. A; Amini, M. (1388 SH/2010 AD). "Urban Quality of Life in Iran (1986–2006)." Social Welfare Quarterly. Vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 113-128.
 
Al Jazeera English. 13 June 2009. "Poll Results Prompt Iran Protests."  Archived from the original on 18 June 2009.
 
Athari, K. (1383 SH/2005 AD). "Housing Poverty in Iran: Poor Social Policy." Social Welfare Quarterly. Vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 113–128.
 
Ayazi, M. (1999 AD/1378 SH). An Introduction to Understanding the Place of Destruction in Islam, the Third Book of the Collection of Articles on Destruction and Political Development: Islam and Destruction. Tehran: Hamshahri Publications.
 
Bashiriyeh, H. (2006 AD/1385 SH). Political Sociology. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
 
Delavari, A. (1999 AD/1378 SH). Investigating the Roots of Violence and Political Instability in Iran, PhD Thesis. Tehran: Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran.
Eftekhari, A; Tajik, M. (2002 AD/1381 SH). An Introduction to Red Lines in Political Competitions. Tehran: Discourse Culture.
Ehteshami, A; Zweiri, M. (2007AD). Iran and the Rise of Neoconservatives, the Politics of Tehran's Silent Revolution. London: I.B.Tauris.
 
 Fairbanks, S. (1998). "Theocracy Versus Democracy: Iran Considers Political Parties." Middle East Journal. Vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 17-31.
 
Firahi, D. (1998 AD/1377 SH). "Basics of Freedom and Party in Shia Religion." Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 133-149.
 
Ghadimi, A. (1999 AD/1378 SH). Jurisprudential and Theological Foundations of Destruction, the Third Book of the Collection of Articles on Destruction and Political Development: Islam and Destruction. Tehran: Hamshahri Publications.
Hosseini, M. (2016 AD/1395 SH). "Political Competition and the Strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Drawing the Desired Situation." Rahbord Quarterly. Vol. 25, no. 80. pp. 185-204.
Huntington, S. (1996 AD/1375 SH). Political Order in Societies Transforming. (M, Thalathi. Trans). Tehran: Nashr-e Elm.
Khajesarvi, Gh. (2003 AD/1382 SH). Political Competition and Political Stability in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Documentation Center.
Pitney, N. (2009). "Iran Election Live-Blogging". www.huffpost.com.
 
Raghib Esfahani, H. (1983 AD/1362 SH). Mufardat. Tehran: al-Ketabah al-Murtazawiyyah.
Saleh, A. (2013). Ethnic Conflict in Iran. In: Ethnic Identity and the State in Iran. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137310873_5
 
Shabestari, M. (1999 AD/1378 SH). Rejection of the Jurisprudential and Theological Foundations of Destruction, the Third Book of the Collection of Articles on Destruction and Political Development: Islam and Destruction. Tehran: Hamshahri Publications.
Thaghafi, M. (1999 AD/1378 SH). Destruction and Parties in the Foundations of Islamic Culture, the Third Book of the Collection of Essays on Destruction and Political Development: Islam and Destruction. Tehran: Hamshahri Publications.
Contemporary Researches on Islamic Revolution
Volume 4, Issue 14
December 2022
Pages 63-84

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics